Coach Larry Brown is a living legend, and even in the twilight of his long career, hiring him was a huge coup for Southern Methodist University. The Mustangs basketball profile has never been very high, and once there was the promise of entering challenging basketball league (the Big East, at the time), they needed a man with name recognition to carry them into the transition.
But as realignment unraveled, basketball powers left the league, and Larry Brown vocalized his concern for the newly-formed American, the question remains: is Larry Brown going to turn SMU basketball into a winner?
To be honest, you have to wonder what’s in it for him at this point. Even for a career NBA coach, the promise of coaching in the former Big East must have been a compelling idea. But for someone of his stature and age to enthusiastically continue coaching in a lower-profile (at least for the time being) conference is a lot to ask for. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible, however.
He’s recruited well so far, and that’s a huge plus for a program that hasn’t made the big dance since 1993. Local Dallas recruit Keith Frazier was listed 49th in the ESPN 100 recruits, and chose SMU over a pair of in-state Big 12 programs. And you have to imagine the returners are going to improve upon another year in the Larry Brown system. So while it’s hard to imagine a team that was 15-17 last season getting a bid this upcoming year, it could certainly happen down the road.
Maybe Larry Brown will stick around long enough for this program to be successful. Maybe he’ll bail after another year or two and ride off into the sunset of retirement. The fact that he’s kept SMU basketball in the headlines at all means he was probably a good hire.
Anyone want to weigh in on this? Thoughts on Larry winning at SMU? Let me know below!
Image Credit: SMU
On one hand, you have to be glad the conference secured a small chance to compete against a “Power 5” team in the postseason (if you want to call the ACC a power conference). On the other hand, you can’t be happy about the American’s 3-6 choice of teams playing the ACC’s 7-10.
I’ve seen the ACC standings before. It doesn’t look pretty past the top three or four teams. We could very easily be seeing an 8-4 Houston Cougars team squaring off against a 6-6 Wake Forest squad. Kind of an insult, really.
I know the bowl picture is still shaping up. I know it’s important to have chances for the American to play marquee conferences. But what I’d really like to see is the conference to have the chance to play the best teams. Heck, give me the top, or even second-best Mountain West team to play against. I guarantee it’ll make for a better football experience than watching a lower tier ACC school bring all 40 of their fans to Annapolis for a snoozer of a game.
You certainly have to appreciate the location of this bowl though. It’s right in American Athletic Conference territory and will be played in a fine stadium. And, if it helps the American rack up more wins against the ACC, I guess that can’t be so bad, either.
Have any thoughts on the new bowl? Share below in the comments.
Image Credit: Navy Sports
At the end of the day, Tulsa is probably the better bet. But UMass would have added a nice flavor, and I’m sorry they aren’t a member of the league.
As of yesterday, the American Athletic Conference is a real thing now. With real teams and a real website. But we know nothing is real until it’s proven on the field and court. That’s why we need a checklist of the things that need to happen for the league to get credibility over the next year.
1) Louisville needs to win a lot, but not win it all in football. It’s hard to deny the kind of exposure U of L is going to give the conference in its last year as a member. This has long been one of the most underrated athletic departments in the country, and it finally has the kind of attention it really deserves. People will watch the Ville on TV because it’s them and might even forget they’re in the American – which is the root of the problem. Louisville relevance for one year is good, but them winning it all spells doom for the future of this league. Cincinnati or Central Florida representation in the league’s final BCS game would go a heck of a lot further for the league than one of the games showcasing another outgoing member. Here’s to hoping the Cardinals finish 10-2 (5-2), and not 12-0.
2) Win out-of-conference games in all sports. Football is the big one here because the opportunities are so huge. Connecticut gets Michigan, USF gets Miami, Cincinnati plays Purdue, Central Florida gets a home date with South Carolina. Win even half of these games and people will stop joking about this conference really quickly. The opportunity is certainly there.
3) Put five teams in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament. It shouldn’t be too hard with Louisville on the slate for 364 more days. But this is far from a cake walk. This essentially means every team that is being heralded as a basketball power in this league (Uconn, Cincinnati, Temple, and Memphis) need to perform. In the off chance that an SMU or Central Florida decide to join the conversation, it could mean a bright future. If Louisville only joins a pair of other schools, be prepared for the dark ages.
4) No academic scandals. No more postseason bans, no NCAA probs, no recruiting violations, no SMU players receiving payrolls (Sorry, I had to). On and off the field, this conference needs to be first class.
5) Improvements in the academic standings in the US News and World Report. Yes, you read that correctly. And yes, it’s a big deal. Whether or not you agree with how schools are ranked, it’s still used for perception. And right now, the American is solidly behind the ACC, BIG, Big 12, Pac 12, and SEC in academics. Alumni giving is a huge component of that, and schools with great athletics tend to do better in alumni giving (seeing the connection here?). If the schools start being recognized as great institutions, the image of the conference will only be enhanced.
Image Credit: SMU Football
Can you think of better things the league needs? Let us know below!
If you need any more proof that the American is going to be treated like a second-class conference, look no further than ESPN. It started with the network offering the conference a whopping $1.8 million per year media deal (if it wasn’t so sad, I’d laugh), but now they’ve actually eliminated the Big East Blog from their website. Granted, the name Big East no longer pertains to this collection of teams, but instead of simply replacing the blog with the American Athletic Blog, they’ve taken it down altogether.
You could kind of tell this was going to happen for a while now. It seems like they always stick a new writer on the blog who clearly doesn’t want to write for it, then promotes them to a different blog months later. There was never any real continuity or passion for the conference – just some hungry journalists’ stepping stone.
But, like it or not, this was a great way for a lot of fans to get updates on the teams from this conference. Now it’s gone. I have no doubt the blog was still being read daily by thousands of fans, so I don’t think the reasoning was monetary. The network wanted to send a message that the American Athletic Conference is a clear step below the “Power Five”.
It looks like we’re getting a sneak peak of the new American Athletic Conference website (theamerican.org) before it’s officially launched on July 1st.
It’s very clean, easy to navigate, modern, and offers a lot of good information. One of my favorite features is the little profiles and quick facts they give about each university that go beyond simple athletics; they even include each school’s PSA. I think it’s important for this league to brand behind the power of the schools on an institutional level instead of just the playing field. Well done, Mr. Aresco.
If we’re comparing this site to the other major conferences, I’d say the American did a pretty fine job. Having this site be a success is absolutely imperative to the future of this conference and they needed to get it right.
Image Credit: The American Athletic Conference